When President Trump listed America’s trade concerns in the Rose Garden, Democrats were likely surprised for the wrong reasons. He echoed their sentiments and attracted their supporters.

For decades, Democrats have supported American farmers and workers, while Republicans focused on free markets. However, Trump’s arrival changed this dynamic.

Trump’s speech may have shocked countries like Cambodia, India, and Sri Lanka. For years, America controlled global trade, restricting access to goods from these nations.

American soil faced quotas on textiles and other products, while agricultural goods were barred entry. Even minor imports of sugar caused a stir among Democrats and Republicans.

For instance, the 2005 trade deal with Central America and the Dominican Republic almost didn’t pass Congress due to minor sugar exports from Costa Rica. This protectionist pattern continued under previous trade agreements.

Currently, only Trump, American farmers, and manufacturing workers argue that they’ve suffered from trade. Earlier trade agreements favored America and its European allies and disadvantaged developing nations.

While America thrived in high-tech industries, the losers were supported. However, Trump has altered this balance by advocating for those who feel left behind.

Trump’s lack of insight into foreign economies contributed to the decline of U.S. manufacturing sectors. Instead of blaming other countries, America’s protectionist policies weakened its competitive edge.

The coalition of those feeling “left behind” comprises disillusioned voters who once supported Democrats. Protecting industries against competition led to their stagnation.

Both Democrats and Republicans played roles in this scenario, as protected industries failed to evolve. Trump’s strategy overlooks the need for innovation in agriculture and manufacturing.

To revive industries like autos and garments, policy adjustments are necessary. Trump’s aggressive approach risks alienating allies and undermining American manufacturing.

The decline of American ingenuity and the push towards rent-seeking can only be reversed with a change in direction. Education, research, and innovation must be priorities, not casualties of Trump’s policies.

Calculating tariffs is complex, and Trump’s approach lacks sophistication. His trade policies, while popular among some, risk harming American interests in the long run.

As America stumbles, the world observes the self-inflicted blows caused by Trump’s trade policies. Economic recovery may require divine intervention or a significant shift in leadership ideology.