Kamala Harris’ economic policies have raised concerns due to her support for higher taxes, Venezuelan-style price controls, and restrictions on American energy production, which could negatively affect working families in the U.S. Harris has a limited track record on trade issues, but the evidence available suggests potential challenges for American producers in the future.

Supporting a robust trade agenda is crucial to ensuring fair and open markets for American food, fuel, and fiber. The U.S. faces higher trade barriers from other countries, making it essential to pursue fair trade agreements that provide export opportunities for farmers, ranchers, and manufacturers. China’s use of state-owned entities to undercut American businesses highlights the need to hold trading partners accountable for unfair practices.

During her time in Congress, Harris’s major trade vote was against the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) in 2019. Despite bipartisan support for USMCA, Harris’s opposition to the deal and preference for the outdated NAFTA raised concerns. Her justification for voting against USMCA focused on environmental issues rather than the needs of the American auto industry.

As Vice President, Harris has supported President Biden’s approach to trade, leading to increased agricultural trade deficits and challenges for American exporters. The administration’s failure to enforce existing trade agreements and reluctance to negotiate new deals has harmed agricultural exports. Additionally, cancellation of LNG export applications to address climate concerns threatens U.S. energy independence and national security.

If elected president, Harris is expected to continue Biden’s trade policies, which may not prioritize U.S. interests or bipartisan agreements. This stance could have adverse effects on American producers and consumers, highlighting the need for leadership that prioritizes their well-being.